by
The National Consensus Commission held a topic-based discussion with political parties at the Foreign Service Academy in Dhaka, focusing on the tenure of the Prime Minister and the formation of an appointment committee for constitutional and statutory institutions. The meeting saw intense debates as parties presented their views on balancing the Prime Minister’s authority with the independence of constitutional bodies.
BNP Standing Committee member Salahuddin Ahmed stated that the BNP agrees to limit the Prime Minister’s tenure to 10 years but opposes the proposed appointment committee for constitutional and statutory institutions. He emphasized that the two issues are interlinked, adding, “Experience in state governance shows that if appointment powers lie elsewhere, the Prime Minister will face obstacles at every step. The BNP has no objection if a search committee is formed through legislation.”
AB Party Chairman Mozibur Rahman Manju, addressing Salahuddin, suggested that if the BNP agrees to the appointment committee, the 10-year tenure limit could be reconsidered. He said, “If BNP accepts the appointment committee, discussions could be held on relaxing the 10-year tenure cap.”
Dr. Ali Riaz, co-chair of the National Consensus Commission, questioned, “Why do you believe the appointment committee is tied to the Prime Minister’s authority?” He further asked, “If the Prime Minister’s interference in independent institutions is unconstitutional, how does it diminish their power?” In response, Salahuddin argued, “If the search committee is included under the law, there’s no need for an appointment committee in the constitution.”
Dr. Riaz countered, “What guarantees that a party in power won’t amend the law?” Salahuddin replied, “What assures that the constitution itself won’t be amended?” He stressed, “Appointments must ensure transparency and accountability. If we assume a party will amend laws upon gaining power, what’s the point of seeking consensus?”
Dr. Riaz noted, “The issues are interdependent. If an appointment committee is formed, you’re not in favor of the 10-year tenure limit.” Salahuddin agreed with this assessment.
Manju reiterated, “Despite bitter past experiences, limiting the Prime Minister’s tenure in the current context is revolutionary. However, the state must be run by maintaining balance among all its organs.”
AI/MR
